Who Doesn't Think about Technology When Designing Urban Environments for Older People??A Case Study Approach to a Proposed Extension of the WHO's Age-Friendly Cities Model
User Experience
acceptance
, aging
, autonomy
, building
, citizen
, city
, community
, people
, place
, technology
, usability
, wellbeing
Journal paper: Abstract: The World Health Organization (WHO) strives to assist and inspire cities to become more ?ge-friendly? and the fundamentals are included in the Global Age-Friendly Cities Guide. An age-friendly city enables residents to grow older actively within their families, neighbourhoods and civil society, and offers extensive opportunities for the participation of older people in the community. Over the decades, technology has become essential for contemporary and future societies, and even more imperative as the decades move on, given we are nearly in our third decade of the twenty-first century. Yet, technology is not explicitly considered in the 8-domain model by the WHO, which describes an age-friendly city. This paper discusses the gaps in the WHO's age-friendly cities model in the field of technology and provides insights and recommendations for expansion of the model for application in the context of countries with a high human development index that wish to be fully age-friendly. This work is distinctive because of the proposed new age-friendly framework, and the work presented in this paper contributes to the fields of gerontology, geography urban and development, computer science, and gerontechnology.
Overview:
This paper addresses the World Health Organization's (WHO) effort to create age-friendly cities and highlights the absence of technology considerations in the WHO's 8-domain model for age-friendly cities. It discusses the gaps in the model and provides insights and recommendations for expanding it, especially for countries with high human development indices. The paper introduces a new age-friendly framework, contributing to multiple fields, including gerontology, geography, urban and development studies, computer science, and gerontechnology. It emphasizes the increasing importance of technology in contemporary and future societies as we move further into the twenty-first century.
Objectives:
The goal is to contribute to the fields of gerontology, geography, urban and development studies, computer science, and gerontechnology by recognizing the increasing importance of technology in contemporary and future societies.
Initiatives:
The article is innovative in its critique of the WHO's model, highlighting the omission of technology considerations, and proposes an expanded framework that acknowledges the importance of technology in modern societies.
Shortcomings:
Although the article is very interesting and has potential, it is relevant to WP5 and not totally to WP1
Relevance Description:
The relevance to NET4Age is to WP5
Opinion:
Although the article is very interesting and has potential, it is relevant to WP5 and not totally to WP1
Sources:
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/19/3525
Keywords:
older adults; ageing; technology; digital; e-health; urban planning; digital ecosystem; robots; gerontechnology; ageing in place; scenario planning