A Commentary on Blue Zones? A Critical Review of Age-Friendly Environments in the 21st Century and Beyond
User Experience
acceptance
, aging
, autonomy
, building
, citizen
, city
, community
, inclusion
, technology
, usability
, wellbeing
Journal paper: Abstract: This paper explores the intersection of the World Health Organization's (WHO) concepts of age-friendly communities and The Blue Zones?checklists and how the potential of integrating the two frameworks for the development of a contemporary framework can address the current gaps in the literature as well as consider the inclusion of technology and environmental press. The commentary presented here sets out initial thoughts and explorations that have the potential to impact societies on a global scale and provides recommendations for a roadmap to consider new ways to think about the impact of health and wellbeing of older adults and their families. Additionally, this paper highlights both the strengths and the weaknesses of the aforementioned checklists and frameworks by examining the literature including the WHO age-friendly framework, the smart age-friendly ecosystem (SAfE) framework and the Blue Zones?checklists. We argue that gaps exist in the current literature and take a critical approach as a way to be inclusive of technology and the environments in which older adults live. This commentary contributes to the fields of gerontology, gerontechnology, anthropology, and geography, because we are proposing a roadmap which sets out the need for future work which requires multi- and interdisciplinary research to be conducted for the respective checklists to evolve.
Overview:
This article explores the convergence of the World Health Organization's age-friendly communities and The Blue Zones?checklists, seeking to create a contemporary framework. It addresses gaps in existing literature and advocates for a more inclusive approach that considers technology and environmental factors for the well-being of older adults. The paper critically evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of these checklists and frameworks. It highlights the need for interdisciplinary research to evolve these frameworks, offering valuable insights to the fields of gerontology, gerontechnology, anthropology, and geography.
Objectives:
The article presents a roadmap for future work with the potential for a global impact on society.
Initiatives:
The initiative is innovative in its endeavor to develop a modern framework that bridges age-friendly concepts, technology, and environmental considerations, potentially addressing current gaps in the literature.
Shortcomings:
The article is a bit generic to apply to WP1.
Relevance Description:
The article is a bit generic to apply to NET4Age.
Opinion:
This initiative is forward-looking, aiming to merge age-friendly community concepts with The Blue Zones?checklists for a contemporary framework, but is a bit generic to apply to WP1, It would be better to apply it to WP5.
Sources:
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/2/837
Keywords:
age-Freindly environments